Book of Daniel

Seventh-day Adventists believe in inspiring those around us to experience a life of wholeness and hope for an eternal future with God. The book of Daniel shares with the book of Ezra the unique phenomenon of being written in two different Semitic languages. The Old Testament as a whole is written in Hebrew, the language of the ancient Israelites. However, a few sections Ezra and and Daniel b—are written in Aramaic. Aramaic, the language of the ancient Aramaeans, who are first mentioned in cuneiform texts from the twelfth century B. From the eighth century on, it became the international language of the Near East. The Israelites appear to have learned Aramaic during the Exile. Historically, Aramaic is divided into several major groups.

Authorship of Daniel

He holds an M. Either the biblical prophets legitimately predicted the future, or they did not. And if they did not predict the future, then the prophets were either intentionally misrepresenting the future or were hopelessly delusional in thinking they could predict it. With so much at stake, then, it is no surprise that skeptics often target biblical prophecy.

If they can prove just one part of one prediction false, then the inspiration of Scripture topples to the ground cf. But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die.

“The practice of late-dating the books of the Bible can be seen as a position of faith on the part of those scholars who do so, though they will.

Beginning the Journey for new Christians. Wilson’s Books Donations Sitemap Appendix 3. Ralph F. Any study of the dating of the Book of Daniel must begin with the dates imbedded within the text. Nearly every chapter is tied to some historical event, beginning in BC when Daniel and his friends were deported from Jerusalem to Babylon to serve in the court of Nebuchadnezzar the Great.

In addition to the “court stories” in chapters , Daniel’s visions are dated as follows:.

Can We Trust the Book of Daniel?

More than any other book of the Hebrew Scriptures , the writings of the prophet Daniel confront us with evidence of the time of Messiah’s coming —evidence that many people would rather not see. But it is there and cannot be ignored. That Daniel was indeed a prophet is well substantiated. He accurately prophesied the rise of the Medo-Persian, Greek and Roman empires even at a time when the Babylonian Empire, which preceded them all, was at its height.

Vasholz, “Qumran and the Dating of Daniel,” JETS 21/4 (): ; G. L.. Archer to an early date for the book of Daniel rather than a late one. ‘%rger, p.

The Book of Daniel claims to be written by Daniel himself, and the fact that it is written mostly in the third person does not contradict that claim. However, it was customary for ancient writers to speak in the third person even when writing about themselves. The one Old Testament exception to this is the Book of Nehemiah, which is in the form of a personal diary.

Even God switches between the grammatical first and third person when speaking of Himself. Fortunately, Jesus took away all doubt on the matter. The Book of Daniel predicts events of the second century before the coming of Jesus especially the period B. The first recorded suggestion for a Maccabean date for Daniel was by the Neoplatonic philosopher Porphyrius of Tyre third century A. An early Christian writer and scholar named Jerome refuted these arguments in his commentary on Daniel.

Influenced by Enlightenment philosophies, academics began to revive the old Maccabean date theory about the Book of Daniel. There was consensus among many academics that every accurate prediction in Daniel was written after the events took place. The modern argument for late dating Daniel is based on supposed inevitable mistakes that a second century B. In our own day, it would be as if someone wrote a story about the Pilgrims landing at Plymouth Rock while mentioning speedboats and computers.


This blog is the blog of the right Wrong. But there are many more wrong Wrongs. To be sure, Wrongs are legion. If you expected somewhat different content on this blog, it may be because you were looking for one of these Wrongs:. NT Wrong 2: author of the NT Commentary Reviews blog, which includes commentary on biblical commentaries [Update: blog no long available]. NT Wrong 3: author of the nt wrong blog, which purports to offer “occasional reports in biblical archaeology” in fact, very occasional: so far, only one.

Scholarly treatment of the Book of Daniel from the original Catholic it is said, to a date later than that of Daniel: its Hebrew is of the distinctly late type which.

Seventh-day Adventists believe in inspiring those around us to experience a life of wholeness and hope for an eternal future with God. THE Seventh-day Adventist doctrinal structure is at several points similar to a spider’s web suspended from a single vital strand. For example, our doctrinal distinctiveness lies in eschatology, and our traditional positions here are dependent upon the validity of the year-day principle and the sixth-century dating of Daniel. Concerning the former I have previously written in The Ministry , 1 and it is the purpose of the present article to consider the latter.

Adventists in general take for granted the authenticity of this book that means so much to us. In this respect we differ from the vast majority of modern scholars. It is doubtful that a single secular university engaging in Biblical studies would accept our position, and it is quite certain that the majority of theological seminaries affirm the Maccabean dating of this Old Testament apocalypse.

If the book of Daniel was written in the second century B.

Daniel: Prophet or Historian?

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer – no Kindle device required. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

One of the arguments put forth which seems to indicate a late date (second century BC) for Daniel is its place in the canon. English versions of the Bible are.

One of the more difficult questions for studying the book of Daniel is when the book was written. The answer to this question touches on the genre of Daniel and the clear prediction of historical events leading up to the Maccabean Revolt and possibly the Roman Empire in the first century. For some readers Daniel is predictive prophecy made by a historical figure.

For many others Daniel is an apocalyptic re-casting of current events from the perspective of the middle of the second century B. This is a highly contentious debate because conservatives tend to make the date of Daniel a litmus test for conservative orthodoxy. The book would have been completed after BC, the last date recorded in the Daniel. Although Daniel is in the first person, there is no clear claim that Daniel himself is the author.

The first six chapters of the book are stories about Daniel and make no claim to be written by Daniel himself. One compelling factor is the presence fragments of nearly every chapter of Daniel among the Dead Sea Scrolls. Goldingay seems to overstate his case here, including allusions to Daniel in other manuscripts such as 4QFlorilegium or the Prayer of Nabonidus. Thanks to James R. One of the manuscripts can be dated to about B. For conservatives, this argues for an earlier date since it seems unlikely Daniel would be considered canonical only 40 years after it was written.

As Goldingay points out, however, we have almost no information on what was or was not canonical in the first century BC and it is anachronistic to impose later canonical guidelines on the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Overview of the Book of Daniel

Discussion concerning the date for the composition of Daniel is controversial. On the surface, it seems that critical scholars have removed any thought of retaining a traditional view towards the composition of the book of Daniel. Supporters of the traditional view, however, have responded in numerous scholarly ways. Yet, it appears to be the case that the majority of biblical scholars, i.

The controversy, though, still wages and the effects of the implications of each model are felt in biblical academia.

The dating of the book of Daniel varies from 6th to 2nd century B.C. Liberal critics, who attribute the authorship to the Maccabeans in B.C., give the book a late​.

Purpose: To assure the exiles and early returnees to the land that God was in control of history and that his prophet Daniel spoke the truth about prolonged troubles before the final stage of God’s Kingdom. Date: Shortly after B. Key Truths: Daniel and his friends were loyal to God during their time in exile. Daniel could be trusted to tell the truth because he never compromised with his captors. God is in absolute control over all of history. Israel’s exile was extended until four kingdoms ruled over God’s people because of their continuing sin.

Trials would come in Israel’s future, but the Anointed One, the Christ, would come and bring salvation. Author: The authorship of the book of Daniel has been a matter of considerable debate among interpreters. Many scholars have dated the book between and B. However, this late date is contrary to the book itself, which indicates that Daniel was its principal author Dan.

The Father William Most Collection

Video series Outside of the Pentateuch, no book of the OT has been subjected to as much scrutiny as the Book of Daniel. The detailed and accurate prophecies contained in that book have motivated many, Skeptic and professed believer alike, to subscribe to the theory of a late date of composition for Daniel in the time of the Maccabees. Most modern radical critics hold that the book was completed in its final form at that time, but some allow for parts of Daniel mainly chapters to have an earlier date prior to Some say the editor in the 2nd century used certain traditions to compose the final form of Daniel.

Aramaic documents from Qumran have dramatically altered views regarding the date of Daniel’s composition. Gerhard F. Hasel, Ph.D., is professor of Old.

There is no evidence to support the idea that Daniel was written in the s, as Daniel died in about BC. Let me change your question to “What evidence is there that Daniel was written in the s BC? You can get a copy at www. But, let me give you the short version! The strongest evidence that Daniel was written in the 6th century BC is the predictive prophecies themselves.

The visions found in Daniel predict with unimaginable accuracy that the 11th emperor of Rome Domitian would persecute the church, change the calendar and the legal system of Rome. The writer of Daniel presumably Daniel himself predicted that the persecution of the Jews by Antiochus Epiphanes BC would last just over three years. He predicted that the Messiah would come to Jerusalem in about AD 30, as well as predicting the destruction of Jerusalem shortly afterward.

He predicted that Rome would be a divided kingdom. I could continue for a very long time.

Michael Heiser – Dating the Book of Daniel